aus2001
08-07-2007, 08:31 PM
Lần theo trang web thấy sồ điểm trong Chỉ số cạnh tranh CN IT của VN đứng gần cuối bảng ! Vậy chỉ số này nói lên điều ǵ ? Các bro cho ư kiến nhé.( nếu post sai vị trí kính nhờ các mod chuyển giúp). Thanks.
IT Competitiveness: Winners and Losers (http://www.xtremevn.com/forum/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=754&mode=thread&order=0&thold=0)
Posted by: comment on Wednesday, July 11, 2007 - 10:36 AM http://img465.imageshack.us/img465/2931/eiumdbc2.gifThe Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU) today issued a press release ranking the IT competitiveness of no less than 64 countries.
At the top of the ranking we find countries like the USA, Japan and South Korea while at the bottom countries like Iran, Nigeria and Azerbaijan are having a hard time trying to catch up.
http://img508.imageshack.us/img508/9946/itcompetitivenessjt8.jpg
Some key findings by the EIU are:
Few nations’ IT sectors can compensate for major environmental weaknesses. India and China have been able to parlay unique factors, such as workforce size, low wages or language attributes, into strong sector performance, compensating for glaring weaknesses in the business environment. Few other countries will be able to manage this feat. Moreover, India and China will need to improve on their enablers, as their cost advantages will erode.
Skills requirements are changing radically. Talented IT employees are in short supply everywhere, but the situation will get tougher, as the nature of skills needed is changing. In addition to technical knowledge, tomorrow’s IT employee will require expertise in project management, change management and business analysis, among other areas. Educational systems in only a few countries have made a firm start to adjust their training curriculum.
Skills-rich emerging markets are likely to move up the index table. Future rivalry to India and China will come from the likes of Russia, Brazil, Malaysia and Vietnam, as well as smaller nations such as Estonia, Lithuania and Chile. Most perform respectably in at least one aspect of IT competitiveness, and the skills base of each is improving. Carving niches in software development and services represents their best chance of moving up the table.
The legal regime is an important differentiator. Countries must balance open competition in IT with robust protection for intellectual property rights. The US and western Europe—thanks partly to the galvanising efforts of the European Union—stand heads above the rest in the degree of protection afforded and in enforcement. A vigorous IPR regime is not incompatible with an “open approach” to innovation in IT.
Eager governments must strike the right balance. Governments can do much to help create an environment in which IT firms will thrive, but it is a delicate balancing act. Through far-sighted policy, governments can help improve competitiveness. At the same time, they must avoid picking winners, among either IT firms or technologies. West European governments have been the most successful in striking the right balance.To read the full press release from the EIU (which also includes a small note on methodology) click right here (http://www.eiuresources.com/mediadir/default.asp?PR=2007071101).
Source: eiu.com (http://www.eiu.com/)
IT Competitiveness: Winners and Losers (http://www.xtremevn.com/forum/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=754&mode=thread&order=0&thold=0)
Posted by: comment on Wednesday, July 11, 2007 - 10:36 AM http://img465.imageshack.us/img465/2931/eiumdbc2.gifThe Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU) today issued a press release ranking the IT competitiveness of no less than 64 countries.
At the top of the ranking we find countries like the USA, Japan and South Korea while at the bottom countries like Iran, Nigeria and Azerbaijan are having a hard time trying to catch up.
http://img508.imageshack.us/img508/9946/itcompetitivenessjt8.jpg
Some key findings by the EIU are:
Few nations’ IT sectors can compensate for major environmental weaknesses. India and China have been able to parlay unique factors, such as workforce size, low wages or language attributes, into strong sector performance, compensating for glaring weaknesses in the business environment. Few other countries will be able to manage this feat. Moreover, India and China will need to improve on their enablers, as their cost advantages will erode.
Skills requirements are changing radically. Talented IT employees are in short supply everywhere, but the situation will get tougher, as the nature of skills needed is changing. In addition to technical knowledge, tomorrow’s IT employee will require expertise in project management, change management and business analysis, among other areas. Educational systems in only a few countries have made a firm start to adjust their training curriculum.
Skills-rich emerging markets are likely to move up the index table. Future rivalry to India and China will come from the likes of Russia, Brazil, Malaysia and Vietnam, as well as smaller nations such as Estonia, Lithuania and Chile. Most perform respectably in at least one aspect of IT competitiveness, and the skills base of each is improving. Carving niches in software development and services represents their best chance of moving up the table.
The legal regime is an important differentiator. Countries must balance open competition in IT with robust protection for intellectual property rights. The US and western Europe—thanks partly to the galvanising efforts of the European Union—stand heads above the rest in the degree of protection afforded and in enforcement. A vigorous IPR regime is not incompatible with an “open approach” to innovation in IT.
Eager governments must strike the right balance. Governments can do much to help create an environment in which IT firms will thrive, but it is a delicate balancing act. Through far-sighted policy, governments can help improve competitiveness. At the same time, they must avoid picking winners, among either IT firms or technologies. West European governments have been the most successful in striking the right balance.To read the full press release from the EIU (which also includes a small note on methodology) click right here (http://www.eiuresources.com/mediadir/default.asp?PR=2007071101).
Source: eiu.com (http://www.eiu.com/)